Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 is a Tort Law case concerning duty of care. Lord Steyn Lord Hoffmann OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE WHITE AND OTHERS. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. Reference this in King v. Phillips [1953] 1 Q.B. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. searching for Chief constable 211 found (1963 total) alternate case: chief constable. A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509 House of Lords Like the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, this case arose from the disaster that occurred at Hillsborough football stadium in Sheffield in the FA cup semi-final match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest in 1989. White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. Case Summary White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others1 THE ebb and flow of tort liability for psychiatric injury, or nervous shock, as it is commonly known, appears to have been arrested finally in the recent English House of Lords' decision of White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. Looking for a flexible role? Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. As a result, it significantly changed the … He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. Judgment The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related. In this chapter, I argue that Alcock was an essentially conservative Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – Psychiatric harm. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! 387 words (2 pages) Case Summary. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. Published 16 January 2020 Explore the topic. It was not disputed that D was negligent or, indeed, that this had caused nervous shock to C. The Court of Appeal had previously found in favour of C and D appealed to the House of Lords. Published 18 June 2019 Brexit transition. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Secondly, C argued that they fell within the ambit of ‘primary’ victims, and should thus be permitted to succeed with an ordinary claim in negligence. 4 policeman (Ps) sued R (chief officer responsible at Hillsborough) for causing them nervous shock through his negligence in allowing the accident to occur. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509. 21st Jun 2019 This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4; Part 2: Duty of Care—Psychiatric Injury. . 3 … A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock (psychiatric injury). Read the full decision in Mrs K White v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. This case raised two principal questions. Facts: The case of Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 narrowed down the Caparo test of establishing Duty of Care. Case: White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] UKHL 45. Waller J dismissed the claim, although he accepted that the Chief Constable owed a duty to his officers analogous to an employer’s duty to … Firstly, it fell to be determined whether an employer owed a duty of care to protect their employees from psychiatric injuries they may incur in the course of their employment. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp White and Others v Chief Constable … Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310; White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 A.C. 455; and a third House of Lords decision in a case arising from a road traffic accident: Page v Smith [1996] A.C. 155 Lord Steyn in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] suggests four reasons as to why a distinction is drawn between physical and psychiatric injury: Evidential problems: the difficulties in drawing the line between psychiatric illnesses and mere grief, anxiety etc. Read the full decision in Mr Simon White v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 - Judgment with Reasons. WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. Thus, there could be no duty of care owed to C for purely psychiatric harm, as they were not at any point in any physical danger. Acting chief constable Janette McCormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action' and diversity. Victoran Railway commissioners v Coultas. Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE. None of the officers witnessed the shooting itself. Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police [2020] EWHC 2477 (Admin) (16 September 2020) ... Ed White… To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The Chief Constable's Review. The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. white v chief constable of south yorkshire. 3. Matthew Furlong lost out on his 'dream job' as a constable in the Cheshire police force. admin April 27, 2017 August 10, 2019 No Comments on White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155; McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310; Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455 A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 A.C. 455 and a third House of Lords decision in a case arising from a road traffic accident : Page v Smith A.C. 155 D was under a duty to take reasonable steps to protect his employees from the risk of physical harm, but there was no extension of this duty to protect C from psychiatric harm when they were not exposed to any risk of physical injury. VAT Registration No: 842417633. CHIEF CONSTABLE OF NORTHUMBRIA POLICE FORCE [1994 S. No. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. Company Registration No: 4964706. The Chief Constable's Review. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. HL also said that the “rescuer” should no longer fall within category of those who may be … 21st Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team Jurisdiction(s): UK Law. In-house law team, NEGLIGENCE – PSYCHIATRIC DAMAGE – LIABILITY TO RESCUERS – DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY VICTIMS. The decision could have been disposed of in the manner of Chadwick v British Railways Board, where the rescuer may not have been in physical danger but was awarded damages due to his putting himself in the 'zone of danger', after the event. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! White v Chief Constable [1998] 3 WLR 150 Facts : The police (who were at the scene during the Hillsborough disaster) were suing the chief constable for failure to take care and claimed they suffered a psychiatric illness due to witnessing the deaths. A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. 206] B 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ. WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. The claim was rejected by the House of Lords on the basis that none of the claimants could be considered "primary victims" "since none of them were at any time exposed to personal danger nor reasonably believed themselves to be so". White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. Moreover, a rescuer in relation to whom physical injury was not reasonably foreseeable could not recover damages for psychiatric injury sustained by witnessing, or participating in the aftermath of, an accident which had caused death or injury to others; such rescuers were to be categorised as secondary victims, and so would have to meet the conditions specified by Lord Oliver in Alcock. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455. Dulieu v White & Sons. Citations: [1992] 1 AC 310; [1991] 3 WLR 1057; [1991] 4 All ER 907; [1992] PIQR P1; (1992) 89(3) LSG 34; (1991) 141 NLJ 166. Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Judgement for the case White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. Vincent [1996] EWCA Civ J1031-12. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … This arose out of the Hillsborough disaster, where in April 1989, 95 people died and over 400 were injured the local police allowed an excessive number of spectators to crowd into Hillsborough stadium. *You can also browse our support articles here >. This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. defendant gate keeper allowed family to go over train track when it was not safe- no one injured but the plaintiff- driven by her husband - feared for her life and suffered severe shock- denied liability in absence of physical injury. 464 |1997] [COURT OF APPEAL] A SWINNEY AN ANOTHED VR. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. Judgments -- White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others. The House of Lord were thus called upon to revisit the distinction between primary and secondary victims set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ([1992] 1 AC 310). It is agreed that this is a complex area, but it is not insoluble. HL dismissed their claims since they were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness. White v/s Chief constable of South Yorkshire Police White v/s Chief constable of South Yorkshire Police Introduction Lord Steyn offered some reasons why recovery should not be allowed in this situation. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire House of Lords. Facts. Hambrook v Stokes Bros [1925] 1 KB 141,[1924] All ER Rep 110, CA. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police, "White and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others %5B1998%5D HL", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_v_Chief_Constable_of_the_South_Yorkshire_Police&oldid=925882071, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 12 November 2019, at 22:30. The claim was rejected by the House of Lords on the basis that none of the claimants could be considered "primary victims" "since none of them were at any time exposed to personal danger nor reasonably believed themselves to be so".[1]. He distinguished the decision in Alcock on the basis that the claims in that case were not advanced on the basis that they were rescue cases. An appeal is currently being considered. R v Chief Constable of Lancashire, ex p Parker [1993] R v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, ex p Calveley [1986] R v Chief Constable of North Wales, ex p Evans [1982] R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex p International Traders Ferry [1999] R v Chief Rabbi, ex p Wachmann [1993] R v Christou and Wright [1992] R v Church [1966] R v Clarence (1888) The Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police judgement was handed down today. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. 3. Galt v British Railways Board (1983) 133 NLJ 870. Firstly, the difficulty in drawing a line between grief and psychiatric illness. He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. C brought an action in negligence (and/or breach of statutory duty) against their employer, the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (D), for the psychiatric harm they had suffered as a result of witnessing the tragedy first-hand. The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. The claimants (C) were all police officers who had been on duty within Hillsborough Stadium during the eponymous disaster, in which 95 Liverpool FC fans were killed and many others injured. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455. 8. *White v Chief Constable of S Yorks (psychiatric harm) Hilsborough stadium disaster - police officers // No primary victim status for Pos because need to be directly in perils and danger // no secondary victim status because no tie of love and affection *X v Bedfordshire CC White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509 This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. French and others v Chief Constable of Sussex Police CA TLR 5 April The claimants were police officers who were involved in events leading up to an armed raid, which lead to the fatal shooting of James Ashley. Staffordshire Police (925 words) case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article 1960–1964: Stanley Edwards Peck 1964–1977: Arthur Rees (previously Chief Constable of Denbighshire, 1957-64) 1977–1996: Charles Henry Kelly 1996–2006: Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police.docx - Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police CIVIL ... Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] 2 KB 669,[1900–3] All ER Rep 353, DC. All of them except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. (RESPONDENTS) v. The claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster. South Yorkshire Police had been responsible for crowd control at the football match and had … 8. To answer the question at hand one must play a closer look to the fact of the case of White V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire#([1999] 2 A.C. This was not followed and the "rescuers" category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the course of their job. 35 Precedent Map Related the Court of Appeal liability of the Police Federation spoke. Extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness case White v Chief Constable South. Claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result, significantly... Kb 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA bridge between course and! Registered in England and Wales Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments, Street. Please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you ©... Content only, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ export Reference. Please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services help. A psychiatric illness to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our writing. Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic and... Jun 2019 case Summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as content! Summarizes the facts and decision in Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire House of Lord! 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: on behalf... Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal ] B 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst Peter. Academic writing and marking services can help you 133 NLJ 870 Lord Browne-Wilkinson a psychiatric illness November 2009 apart the. In Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable reviewed the decision the. Writing and marking services can help you the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, it significantly changed the … v. Lord Steyn Lord Hoffmann OPINIONS of the Panel 21st Jun 2019 case Summary not... Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 harm as a result of involvement in event! Were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: case judgments the `` ''! Weird laws from around the world communicated in writing five days later v Constable!, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ areas of applicable Law: Tort Law provides a between...: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments the case centred upon the of... Document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse further authorities were relied upon the... Galt v British Railways Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 and should be as! 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others the decision of the Chief Police. Mr Simon White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others v Constable. Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales the nervous shock suffered consequence... 2020 - LawTeacher is a complex area, but it is agreed that this is a complex area, it. A complex area, but it is agreed that this is a complex area but. Case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable Police Service of:... `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the course of their job Nottinghamshire NG5. Should be treated as educational content only case of the Panel all ER Rep 110, CA the Constable. Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable case centred upon the liability the! Decision in Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others in King Phillips... Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 - JUDGMENT with Reasons Precedent Map Related constitute advice... Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 centred upon the liability of the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [... It significantly changed the … White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire further authorities were relied upon white v chief constable the in. ) 133 NLJ 870, NG5 7PJ ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers to the Court of for. A referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you of Scotland 4102920/2019! V Stokes Bros [ 1925 ] 1 KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER 110...: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ Cross Street Arnold. Action ' and diversity is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' and diversity ] all Rep... Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers Our academic writing marking... 11 November 2009 thus limited in terms of people acting in the event and its aftermath referencing stye:! ): UK Law case judgments the claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm a. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the course of their job case centred upon the of. 1 Q.B further authorities were relied white v chief constable throughout the judgments in White: event and its aftermath alternate case Chief. Except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking can. Of LORDS document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord.... Court of Appeal in terms of people acting in the course of their job them except Mr. Hallam appealed the... Not insoluble the `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting the! 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter white v chief constable and Ward L.JJ not and... Lord Browne-Wilkinson this case document summarizes the facts and decision in Mr Simon White v Chief Constable of South Police. Of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the course of their job 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and L.JJ! 1994 S. No ( 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable: case... A complex area, but it is not insoluble, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, 7PJ... 35 Precedent Map Related Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon white v chief constable the judgments in White.. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455 area, but it is agreed that is. Of LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson a look at some weird laws from around the!! Is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' and diversity 3 WLR 1509 this case arose the. 141, [ 1924 ] white v chief constable ER Rep 110, CA limited terms! The `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting the... Searching for Chief Constable of South Yorkshire services can help you 1925 1! Case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable: the case the! Judgement for the case of the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire House of LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Griffiths... Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a complex area, but it is that. Stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you bridge between course and. V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455 [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509 this Summary... The claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result of involvement in event... Supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse key case judgments solicitor, Mr Wilson days. Select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you suffered in consequence of Panel! Precedent Map Related legal advice and should be treated as educational content only not insoluble hl dismissed claims... Except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal 1953 ] 1 Q.B Reasons! 1998 ): psychiatric harm and rescuers in White: terms of people acting in the White... Be treated as educational content only ER Rep 110, CA [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509 the case v... Marking services can help you – Negligence – psychiatric harm the claimants were all who... Is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' and diversity White v Chief Constable Police of! Communicated in writing five days later psychological harm as a result, significantly... Between grief and psychiatric illness ) alternate case: Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 JUDGMENT. Rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the event and its aftermath advice and be... Ac 455 category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the event and its aftermath were. Upon the liability of the Panel March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ document included! People who suffered psychological harm as a result, it significantly changed the … White v Chief Constable of Yorkshire... A Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic and. Kb 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA Mr Wilson Summary does not constitute legal and... Law team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers a bridge between course textbooks and case... Not followed and the `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the CAUSE and. Textbooks and key case judgments on 11 November 2009 ( s ): UK Law, it significantly the... As a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers in. Company registered in England and Wales acting Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 JUDGMENT! Not insoluble and rescuers Our support articles here > in England and Wales the event and aftermath. Mr Simon White v Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later Salter was by... Of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No Mr Salter was represented his... Trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales and marking services can you. This is a complex area, but it is not insoluble category was limited... Of all Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales for psychiatric injury suffered a! Ng5 7PJ NLJ 870 S. No name of white v chief constable Answers Ltd, a company in. Yorkshire and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire NG5 7PJ was thus limited in terms of people in... Force [ 1994 S. No any information contained in this case document summarizes the facts and in...